God on the Brain

[andrewblow]

Praise the Lord, Clay. I stand with you in that witness to your Mum's healing.

I also acknowledge that most people will not accept or believe you. Why should they ??- it's just another freaky turn of nature.....isn't it ?? These things happen - don't they ?? !!

But having myself been healed 8 years ago through prayer of "99.9% sure - uncurable myaloma bone cancer" I KNOW God does some wonderful things for his children.

However - as Jesus said to the guy who wanted to return from hell to warn his brothers - "Even if you were to return - THEY WOULD STILL NOT BELIEVE YOU"........that's the way it is when you are on the broad and easy road to destruction with your eyes closed.

Not my words - the non-existent God-person............................

[bm-21Lemko]

I believe you and my cadechist teacher told me his mother saw jesus when she had a near death experience.

[andrewblow]

I don't see your point.....except maybe the smillie gives you away

I personally was not near death - just for 6 weeks THOUGHT I was going to die a lot earlier than previously thought. I tell you my friend - that is a very focussing situation. You tend to look at the whole value and scale and achievements in your life and wonder how and what needs to change for your last couple of years.

But praise God he saw it differently and reacted to sincere prayers from his children and gave me a complete new agenda.

[bm-21Lemko]

oh sorry, i just meant that gods presence is everywhere even through the ruff patches, and when he is ready to recieve you then you will know. My cadechist teacher told me or as the story goes, his mother was in the hospital and had a near death experience and saw jesus. Jesus then said to her that she is not yet done and still has more to do, before she leaves.

if choose or don't choose to believe the stories, that is up to you as what some call miracles. i don't care what you believe, i just try to fit the puzzle pieces together in this strange world.

that is all. Thanks again for your input Sir Andrew.

[andrewblow]

I hear what you say and respect that.

[StormAU]

I haven't seen this till today so here is my reply

Originally Posted by fedorowich

That dating remark you made just ended this discussion. I am astonished by that and I hope you do your homework on that to see how horribly wrong you are about science. Why are you so bitter? Are you stuck in your ways and when somebody disagrees with you, you bad mouth them and say their reasonings sucks. Just because you can't explain something doesn't entitle you to get angry and spit off jibberish of how science explains nothing. I've left you with a page of stuff to disagree with and you simply can't explain it. Solid evidence and proof are in the last couple of pages. I said delusional, one word. Has the meaning "of false belief or opinion". Why are you taking it so personal that you have to personally insult me. Come on, we were having a civil argument just ended by your ego. Damn right I'll whine. I enjoy discussing this subject until people like you come in. Give your head a shake. Capacity does not mean just size. Dictionary.com - try it!

At the risk of opening old wounds this is why I discussed this topic in the manner I did.

Originally Posted by fedorowich

I don't think mocking one of the smartest prof about not providing enough proof can be an argument made from someone who follows God. Why are you very skeptical of things that suddenly shed new light on the brain. Why are believers so quick to strike down something that may disagree or disprove a belief? If knowledge is power, than why not take in consideration everything and than make a decision.

No one mocked anything before this post was made, we just disagreed with parts of what was written in the OP.

Then in a following post you label my post as ignorant and it annoys you

Originally Posted by fedorowich

Science 'set of theories' that can not be tested. The ignorance is annoying.

Wow by inference you called me ignorant

Then in another thread

Originally Posted by fedorowich

^^^ totally absurd. So many flaws in that reply. Sort of upsetting to see that as a reply.

This is someones beliefs you are bagging and considering your final reply to me this here is rather hypocritical.

Then you bring up a dragon and ask that we don't call you delusional after your own comments. Sorry fed but maybe its you who needed to settle down.

Now to the dating arguement. Using Dictionary.com the meaning of Element is: Chemistry. one of a class of substances that cannot be separated into simpler substances by chemical means. See also chart under periodic table.
Also: A fundamental, essential, or irreducible constituent of a composite entity.

Science says that Helium and Hydrogen were produced in the time from of the first 3-20 minutes after the big bang, everything else was formed after this. How they know anything formed within 20 minutes astounds me but hey they're the scientist aren't they.
Anyway getting back to dating methods, IF the elements of Helium and Hyrdogen were formed withing the first 20 minutes of the universes existence then it stands to reason that dating either of these 2 elements would give a definitive number for the universe. With regards to the age of the earth it would then stand to reason that dating an element that is deep withing the earths surface in an area that scientist agree has been geologically stable for the longest time should give a definitive number for the age of the material that is the basis for the earth's existence. Now fed if you have difficulty with these assumptions then please feel free to provide your understanding regarding this and please refrain from the comments you used previously regarding peoples posts as it is obvious you do not like them returned to you.