|
|||||||
USA - Losing its Global Influence
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello Again AkMak!
Although we are deviating from the original thread subject, I will attempt to respond to your comments as I see it.
The human cost to the all the participants of the first World War made such an impact upon the British that they were minded never to go to war again. They resisted doing so even though Winston Churchill warned them that Adolf Hitler was arming to the teeth. As a result Britain was unprepared when it was forced to declare war on Hitler's regime when it invaded Poland, as Britain was obliged to do under a treaty with Poland. The war left my country almost bankrupt because of it indebtness to the USA for the arms we had to buy from the USA in our own defence, because of unpreparedness. I was born in 1944 and never saw a candy bar or a banana until I was 9 years old because such luxuries were unavailable unless you were rich. Meanwhile the USA gave much of the British debt repayments to the defeated Germany as part of the Marshal Plan. The British have learned that modern warfare it a "no win situation", even if you are on the winning side. The British people have noted that countries who haven't indulged in recent wars are noticeably better off, with better social conditions and pensions for its citizens. The British people have protested against almost every war (except the Falklands) that our "Special Relationship" with the USA has involved us in. Indeed, it is an indictment against our democracy that we are fighting in Afganistan, as I'm confident the majority of Brits don't want our soldiers there. We see it as "another no win situation". As for why don't other countries consider going to war with Switzerland? That's because it's where all the corrupt poltiiciains (especially Asian and African presidents), along with the tax dodging multi billionaire global oligarchs stash their ill gotten gains in their secret ban accounts. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The U.S. is not solely to blame since our economy is tied in with other economies and most countries are affected with the exception of Russia |
|
|||
|
bm21Lemko said:-
bm21Lemko said:-
The U.S. is not solely to blame since our economy is tied in with other economies and most countries are affected with the exception of Russia. Yes, but please remember that when the US economy sneezes the rest of those lesser economies catches a cold. Western Europe has been financially linked to the USA since the end of WW2. Europe's banks have been left with many bad debts and dubious investments resulting from the Wall Street fiasco. Western economies have trusted the USD and USA investments. Russia has never been part of this because of the Cold War and in the post Soviet time struggled alone until it realised that by bringing most of the petroleum and gas revenues under state control it could suceed alone without undue leaning on the "Greenback" Doillar. What a lovely position to be in! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
For the U.S. it has been a series of different collapses in investments domestically and globally, credit crunches, and a fall in global markets. You can't pay for something if you dont have the money. A big problem with credits is its not backed by anything. yes Russia and central Asia operate differently because they have a vast amount of resources they shall be fine. Once Ukraine comes back under the sphere of Russia i think the economy will do better because Russia and rich ukrainians will invest more into the economy. Just like China and Southeast Asia rely on manufacturing. Now I'm not sure where you live. But what have you seen Obama do with helping the economy? He controls both the majority of the house and the senate. We have had an expansion of government where programs are underesource and pretty much useless. When one of Obamas adivsors made a structure change the stock market dropped several points, there is a clue. |
|
|||
|
[QUOTE=AkMike;102902]
Quote:
I'm not against liberals, but stop grouping conservatives. Arizona is a single state that make its own choices. My favorite part about this whole immigration debate is the fact that LA wants to boycott Arizona. Well if they truly do they also have to boycott 20% of electricity Arizona provides and Arizona is eager to cut the power
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
As before, I turn to Ray Stevens for insight on whats going on. ![]() |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:33.


















Linear Mode

Algeria
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Scotland
South Africa
Virtual Countries