|
|||||||
NONSON's RELIGIOUS HATRED & RACIAL STEREOTYPES HAVE NO PLACE HERE. HEOUTTA BE EXPELLE
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Islam is all about doing bad things to good people. Only a fool would come on to a forum and state such stupidities. It is mandated by Qur'aanic teachings that Muslims do evil things to non-Muslims. Anyone can find hundreds of verses in that book to confirm this. The entire history of Islam is one long horror story wherein millions have either been enslaved or murdered. Even todays there are thousands dying at the hands of these lovers of peace. Add to it the rapes of male and female, even infants, and the robberies and the picture becomes nearly incomprehensible. When one is dealing with a Muslim one should always remind oneself that he/she is not in the company of a rational human being. Their thinking (reasoning) is based on something far removed from that of the average human. To the Muslim the death of others (non-Muslims) is almost without meaning. The Western ideas of ethics, morality, politics, and religion is for the most part beyond the effective grasp of the Muslim. All one needs do to ascertain this is too carefully read the Kazanova's posts that are by Muslim (Arabic) authors. To the person they are ignorant of our ways.
Nonson 2.24.01 |
|
|||
|
LippyChick,
You wouldn't "slap it away", believe me !!! ![]() You'd say : " Pppwwoooaaarrr!!!!! I'll have some o'that. " Steve V. " My mate anacdotes " are a personalised form of "empirical evidence" and I don't apologise for them. I'm STILL waiting to hear why your Sikh 'chaps' dislike muslims ??? I've told you why 'my' Sikh G.P. doesn't; now let's hear why sikhs known to you, do ?? You're happy enough (as I am too) with MS Lippychick's account of her friend who was abducted. How come mine aren't good enough?? Earlier, you (fair enough) criticised me over "linguistics"; but then you dismiss the Economist's EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE by (again, fair enough) pointing to their reference to Ukraine as THE Ukraine. We both know that The Economist leans as much towards the U.S. as Britain - and americans commonly refer to Ukraine as The Ukraine. And we all know how they (mis)pronounce "Eye-rak" or "Eye-ran" or "Mascaw". Surely, a "linguistic" argument ?? ![]() S.B. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:14.








Linear Mode

Algeria
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Scotland
South Africa
Virtual Countries