|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Mike....
Western Ukrainians declared independence after World War I and competed with Poles for the territory known as Halychyna and the historic city of Lviv that dominated the area. Outnumbered, Ukrainians lost a 1918-1920 war with the Poles. Western Ukraine remained a part of Poland until 1939 when the Germans and Soviets attacked and dismembered Poland. During the war, Ukrainian and Polish partisans accused each other of carrying out atrocities against each other's communities. After World War II, Western Ukraine, including Lviv, was incorporated into Soviet Ukraine and there is still bitterness about the expulsion from the area of hundreds of thousands of Poles and the expulsion from Poland of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians. Bitter people tend to stretch the truth in their favor. ![]() Mike. You call us dishonest because we don't agree with you limited point of view? ![]()
__________________
![]() Slava Ukraini |
|
|||
|
Michael, UPA can't be recognized as a fascist organization.
Zbyszek, I didn't say I actually believed you... well, maybe you are right but only when speaking about fear,not real actions. Poles supported Ukrainian independence? By numerous efforts to conquer Ukraine (Kyivian organs of power changed for 21 (I've also heard of 19 and 23, I don't remember)times - and many of these were Polish). Polish Army had a war with UHA... Don't say Poles supported Ukrainian independance - they could only support Ukrainian independance FROM RUSSIA. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
I'm glad there are so many Polish people around that I can call my friends. If you were the only one I've ever talked with I wouldn't think much of your country or people.
__________________
![]() Slava Ukraini |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
"Accused"? You sound like you disbelieve this accusations. Say it openly: do you deny that UPA has murdered thousands of Polish civilians? Quote:
For the Polish side, the bitterness after loss of Lwow/Lviv and other lands was directed at Soviet Union and partially US/UK, not Ukrainians - in the Polish eyes, it was "Soviets" or "Russians" who took these lands, not "Ukrainians". "Ukrainian" was not linked with Soviet Union at all, "Ukrainian" was linked with UPA and mass murders and it had a much stronger negative impact than "Russian" or "Soviet". Quote:
1.Ukrainian partisans from UPA have commited mass murder of Polish civilians basing on ethnic criteria. 2. The act described above in #1 was a fascist ethnic hate act. Could you please tell us how exactly are these two points wrong in your opinion? Quote:
Why not? BTW How many differences between UPA and for example the Croatian Ustashe can you really find? Quote:
Dobko, the other Michael might not like Ukrainians much, but I must say that I personally get a strange feeling when I see Ukrainians defending UPA, saying it was't a fascist organisation, etc etc. BTW I don't know if you have read the article by J.P. Himka (http://www.univie.ac.at/spacesofidentity/_Vol_5_1/_HTML/Himka.html). I'm posting here selected fragments of it. "Instead, there persists a deafening silence about, as well as reluctance to confront, even well-documented war crimes, such as the mass murder of Poles in Volhynia by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA)[7] and the cooperation of the Ukrainian auxiliary police in the execution of the Jews (...) In the diaspora one frequently encounters a double standard in discussing war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by Ukrainians as opposed to those perpetrated against Ukrainians. Memoirs and eyewitness accounts, for example, are considered untrustworthy evidence for the former, but trustworthy for the latter; that is, Jewish or Polish first-hand accounts of Ukrainian war crimes are dismissed as biased, while an important Ukrainian victimization narrative, the famine of 1932-33, has relied primarily on just such eyewitness accounts (...) One was the late Ivan L. Rudnytsky, a scholar possessed of great civil courage. He questioned the view commonly accepted in diaspora historiography that the Bandera movement underwent a democratic transformation in the second half of 1943 and in 1944. He specifically criticized the xeonophobia of OUN, in particular its attitude toward the Jews during World War II and its “conscious campaign of ‘cleansing the land’ of Polish population.”[37] At the 1983 Ukrainian-Jewish conference, in response to Yaroslav Bilinsky’s call for Jewish scholars to examine Jewish participation in Stalinist crimes, Ivan Rudnytsky said: “Everybody should make some house cleaning first within his own group and it would be improper for Ukrainians to tell Jewish scholars what they have to do with Jewish history. This is their problem, but we should begin now to clean our own house, and we have not been good enough at it. (...) Sister Sophia Senyk has criticized the Greek Catholic church in Ukraine for its uncritical attitude towards UPA. In an article published in the journal of the Keston Institute, Religion, State & Society, she wrote: “While some of its members were no doubt idealistic freedom fighters, the UIA [= UPA] also has on its records numerous massacres of civilian population and burnings, just as Nazi and communist military formations do.” (...) UPA’s atrocities against civilians have been documented in riveting archivally based studies by Jeffrey Burds,[47] and he is currently working on a book-length, revisionist study of UPA. Volodymyr Serhiichuk published a volume of documents on the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and UPA that was meant to cast the nationalists in a favorable light. Nonetheless he included a document from an UPA unit in Volhynia that reported on its annihilation of Polish villages in the spring of 1943.[48] As more archival research is conducted, it is probable that more such information will come to light. Of course, the results of scholarly research are in most cases slow to be integrated into collective memory, but this is especially so when they are not easily accommodated into the existing narrative. (...) Also, since the 1920s Western Ukrainian nationalism had promoted ruthlessness towards national enemies: enemies were to be destroyed not forgiven, and the strong were to crush the weak.[54] Interwar and wartime Ukrainian nationalism was quite different from Nazism, but it did grow out of some of the same impulses and it led to some murderous actions." Whad do you think about that article Dobko? Michael [Edited by MichaelB_PL on 15th October 2005 at 11:42] |
|
|||
|
Nice to say you're wrong Benda
Quote:
UHA was only one of many independence concepts for Ukraine. Petliura tried broader base but he failed. When he entered Kyiv with Pisudski he found indifferent people, tired of war. They had fighting enough. |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04.








Linear Mode
