|
|||||||
Why are Poles so bitter
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
I asked this question before and many poiles said "because the Russians didn't apologise and the Germans did." Well white Americans haven't apologised for slavery or America hasnt apologised for making colonies of other countries or forcing their Politics (what they called democrasy) on many countries around the world over its history. Even today America pushes its foreign policy everywhere. Yet the Poles continue on ahting the Russians, and other Eastern neighbors. It's quite sad actually. I am not even shure but I actually heard Kruschev , Yeltsin and other Russian leaders did apologise for Stalinist crimes such as Katyn (which paled in comparison to german crimes) yet the Poles keep continueing their hatin.
|
|
|||
|
Combatant syndrome
Quote:
1. Russians do not need to apologise more. Memory of the Soviet world is just too fresh to forget so easily. 2. America used to be aggressive but it has been a distant past. 3. Poland is stil strongly pro-American. I think it makes Poland look more anti-Russian now. 4. No need to hate Russians, really. Good people, similar Slavic qualities. 5. Yeltsin apologized in fact. 6. Sure, German crimes were monstrous. I think some Polish media are too much politically motivated. On the other hand Poland enjoys blessed diversity of opinion and Polish reader has enough material to have a balanced perspective. I have no doubt that, from historical perspective, German expansionism was far more dangerous for Poland than any Russian one, with one big Soviet exception. Killer, do not forget which communist country was most bold in actively resisting communism which only culminated in the Solidarity movement. Maybe combatant syndrome could be a good answer to your question???? |
|
|||
|
Killer, in reply to your post I think the word "hate" is not an accurate representation of the way Poles feel about Russians. If only our relationship were that simplistic. Many Poles are still living with the trauma of the Soviet years. They are traumatised rather than bitter. I have in fact heard that it is the other way around, that Russians hate Poles. There seems to be a lack of trust on both sides. It is a pity because we are all Slavs. All the suffering has been such a waste, and what was it all for?
|
|
|||
|
Poles got what they deserved after all they sucked up to nazis first
March, 16 1933
At the World conference on disarmament the British prime minister has offered to allow to Germany to double the strength German Army and to reduce the strength of the French army. 1933 Refusal of Poland to take part in offered by the USSR " East pact ". Poland and Germany have offered the USSR to conclude such pact without France and Czechoslovakia but on such conditions USSR has refused. January 1934 The nonaggression pact between Germany and Poland. May, 2 1935 The Soviet-French political treaty about mutual aid. However in June 1936 L.Blume's government came to authority in France which was against signing the military treaty with the USSR has come, and it was not made. June, 18 - 1935 England signed with Germany the sea agreement allowing Germany to have the military fleet. March, 7 1936 German Army came to the Rhine area. Poland has supported this step. France has declared, that has no more obligations to Warsaw. England has taken a neutral position. Later Poland also has supported invasion of Austria. November, 19 1937 Lord Halifax while visiting Hitler in Oberzaltzberg offers agreement of 4 powers without the USSR; he told that " and other members of the English government are full of consciousness, that fuhrer has achieved a lot not only in the Germany, but as a result of destruction of communism in the country he has blocked a way of communism to the Western Europe and consequently Germany can be considered as a bastion of the West against Bolshevism ". The end of April 1938 Halifax has declared to German representative Kordt that the Great Britain will not undertake additional military obligations to France, not speaking about Czechoslovakia. May, 18 1938 The president of Czechoslovakia Benes has told the English ambassador: " if the Western Europe will lose interest to Russia, Czechoslovakia will lose it too ". September, 20 1938 The Soviet government has answered Benes that will assist Czechoslovakia if France too will assist; refusal of Poland to pass the Soviet armies even at the request of France. In Poland at that time they speak: " with Germany we can lose independence, and with Russia - our soul ". September, 21 1938 At 2 o'clock in the morning the Anglo-French ultimatum to the government of Czechoslovakia about acceptance of the German requirements issued. After signing the Munich agreements the president of USA has sent congratulation Chamberlan. October, 2 1938 The Polish armies occupied the Czech Tesin and adjoining territory . Thus, Poland together with hitlerite Germany participated in occupation and a partition of Czechoslovakia and input of the Soviet armies to Poland was not unique and not the first similar action of that time. November 1938 Armies of Hungary have occupied a part of Slovakia and belonging to Slovakia Zakarpatye Ukraine (Slovakia that time was halfindependent country after a partition of Czechoslovakia). November 1938 The ambassador of USA in Paris: "it would be desirable for the democratic countries that there, in the East, business has reached the sanction of questions at issue by war between Germany and Russia ? In England, and USA hotly trust France, that the nearest months the great sanction of questions in the east " will begin. March, 9 1939 The British ambassador in Berlin Genderson: " it seems inevitable to me , that Germany wants tear off this rich country (Ukraine) from the huge Russian state. we can not to give Germany of cardblanche in the East blindly. But achievement of the agreement with Hitler is not impossible, assuming that it will be limited to reasonable conditions which observance is possible to expect from Hitler". March, 10 1939 Stalin's application that the main warmongers are England and France, instead of Germany. March, 27 1939 The British Minister for Foreign Affairs Halifax to the ambassador in Warsaw Kennard: " it should be clear that all our attempts to consolidate position are destroyed, if the Soviet government openly will take part in this plan ". (concerning the offer of the USSR to call conference on discussion of the help of Romania). April, 14 1939 The British government has offered Soviet Union to give unilateral obligations to neighbouring countries. Obligations to the USSR was not provided. April, 17 1939 The answer of the Soviet government about desirability of the conclusion tripartite (the USSR, England, France) agreements. May, 3 1939 Minister for Foreign Affairs Litvinov with pro-Western orientation is removed and replaced with Molotov. May, 8 1939 The answer of the governments of England and France with a rejection to the Soviet offer and recurrence of their memorandum from April, 14. May, 28 September, 15 1939 The ÿÍÁÅÐßÉÍ-Japanese conflict on the river the Halhin-Gol. In same time England concludes the contract with the Japanese government. June 1939 Confidential negotiations of the Great Britain with Germany on sections of spheres of influence. Russia and China were offered to Germany. June, 12 1939 The offer to Halifax to arrive to Moscow. Halifax refused. August, 11 1939 The English delegation of minor figures arrives to Moscow. It is typical, that they have gone to Moscow by steamship, instead of usual at that time plane. In Moscow it is found out, that the English delegation has no official powers on negotiating. The English and French military missions have offered to discuss the general(common) principles without consideration of real military plans. August, 19 1939 The conclusion in Berlin of the trading - credit agreement between the USSR and Germany. August, 23 1939 The conclusion of the notorious Soviet-German pact in Moscow. |
|
|||
|
Poland as a nation is analogous to a jackal that whines about being mistreated but promply pounces on weaker neighbors when the opportunity presents itself.
Most of the crimes pinned on the USSR by Poland are groundless - Katyn was the work of the Germans, and the Warsaw Rising was their business. The Soviet Army didn't need to ditch its strategy to help an insurgence that would hurt the USSR more than help it. |
|
|||
|
Based on all that has been presented, I accept that the Soviets executed those Polish officers at Katyn.
Stalin earlier had executed a good portion of the Red Army officer corps. Stalin's policies were more political and less bigoted. A nice exchange with a Polish nationalist at this link: http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@3....77473289/6465 |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:29.









Linear Mode

Algeria
Bangladesh
Ecuador
Morocco
Nepal
Nicaragua
Puerto Rico
Scotland
South Africa
Virtual Countries