Go Back   Ukraine.com Discussion Forum > Culture > History


Whose Worse? Hitler or Stalin?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 18th May 2009, 00:12
bm-21Lemko bm-21Lemko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,048
bm-21Lemko is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ak-Murza View Post
Adm.A.V.Kolchak was a Tatar.It wasn't called a "russian civil war",just Civil War.

Anyhow,one has to make a difference between mAAskva and the rest of Russia.Russians mostly don't like mAAskva too much,and the further East you go,the more dislike turns into hate.I'm from Sakhalin Island,so you can imagine my "love" towards mAAskva and it's filthy politics.....
I thought Admiral Kolchak was of romanian descent???

I see there is quite a big ukrainian diaspora on Sakhalin Island. During the Soviet terror, rusyns were only moved into present day Ukraine as far as i know. Thats why there is a higher population than in Poland, Slovakia, and Romania today.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 18th May 2009, 00:51
Ak-Murza Ak-Murza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phila,PA,USA
Posts: 268
Ak-Murza is an unknown quantity at this point
Adm.A.V.Kolchak is of Romanian,or,rather,Moldovan descent,true,but since his last name is Tatar,his ancestors must have moved to Moldova long before,probably part of Tatar mersaneries.

"...Let us not overlook certain noblemen we always will consider as the best, noblest people of Russia: Gavriil Derjavin, direct descendant of Narbek dynasty; Leon Tolstoy, direct descendant of Idris dynasty; Fedor Dostoevskiy of the Cheleby dynasty; Alexander Kuprin, Tugan- Baranovski, and Anna Ahmatova of the Chagoday dynasty. The very last names of these people speak for them: there were Aksakov (meaning, "limping" in Turkic); Kutuzov (from Khuduz, meaning, "mad"); and Kolchak (from Kholchakh, meaning, "glove")."""...
Crimean Tatars, an article by Vladimir Polyakov


Most Ukrainians came to the Island after WW2.The official NKVD term was "Bandery"(from S.Bandera),but it would include any collaborators,nationalists and even AK people.The standart sentence was 8 years of labor camps on Kolima followed by life exile/settlement on Russian Far East.Sakhalin Island was reserved for the worst of the worst "offenders"
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 18th May 2009, 14:20
bm-21Lemko bm-21Lemko is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,048
bm-21Lemko is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ak-Murza View Post
Adm.A.V.Kolchak is of Romanian,or,rather,Moldovan descent,true,but since his last name is Tatar,his ancestors must have moved to Moldova long before,probably part of Tatar mersaneries.

"...Let us not overlook certain noblemen we always will consider as the best, noblest people of Russia: Gavriil Derjavin, direct descendant of Narbek dynasty; Leon Tolstoy, direct descendant of Idris dynasty; Fedor Dostoevskiy of the Cheleby dynasty; Alexander Kuprin, Tugan- Baranovski, and Anna Ahmatova of the Chagoday dynasty. The very last names of these people speak for them: there were Aksakov (meaning, "limping" in Turkic); Kutuzov (from Khuduz, meaning, "mad"); and Kolchak (from Kholchakh, meaning, "glove")."""...
Crimean Tatars, an article by Vladimir Polyakov


Most Ukrainians came to the Island after WW2.The official NKVD term was "Bandery"(from S.Bandera),but it would include any collaborators,nationalists and even AK people.The standart sentence was 8 years of labor camps on Kolima followed by life exile/settlement on Russian Far East.Sakhalin Island was reserved for the worst of the worst "offenders"
So is there a tatar community in Moldova? Or is Moldovan romanians have tatar ancestry?
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 18th May 2009, 17:27
Ak-Murza Ak-Murza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phila,PA,USA
Posts: 268
Ak-Murza is an unknown quantity at this point
Tatar mercenaries were invited to serve and settle by countries from Turkey to Lituvania. Great many were made noblemen by those countries.So,yes,there are Tatar communities all over Europe,discended from those mercenaries.Poland would be a good example.There are Tatar enclaves there,many Tatars were shljahta zastenkova,serving in Poland's military.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 14th October 2009, 22:07
V-G V-G is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,444
V-G has a spectacular aura aboutV-G has a spectacular aura aboutV-G has a spectacular aura about
We'd need a poll to answer the OT question. I think Hitler, but both are pretty close.
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 15th October 2009, 13:42
jedna_brew jedna_brew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20
jedna_brew is on a distinguished road
both are the same ****, slightly differ only on extermination methods.

mao zedong was even worst - there are calculations that 60 million people died because of his rules, e.g. "great jump" and "cultural revolution".
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 16th October 2009, 12:04
StormAU StormAU is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 352
StormAU is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by jedna_brew View Post
both are the same ****, slightly differ only on extermination methods.

mao zedong was even worst - there are calculations that 60 million people died because of his rules, e.g. "great jump" and "cultural revolution".
If you take it by population figures (Casualties/Original Population) I think you will find people like Pol Pot and Idi Amin were even worse. Uganda is only now recovering properly from Idi Amin's regime and Cambodia will probably take another generation at least to recover from the policies of Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge.

Getting back to Hitler and Stalin, my vote would be Hitler. The methods of extermination and the racial views that encouraged these methods were not only brutal but were so horrific as to be inhuman. No one has the right to experiment on others just because they are considered different, no one has the right to attempt the extermination of entire ethnic groups. Yet the Nazi's did this and actively encouraged others to do it also.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC4 © 2006, Crawlability, Inc.